Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Vredestein Quatrac

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

UltraGrip Performance+

Quatrac

9.2

R15 – R20

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Quatrac

Anzahl der Tests

3

23

16

Optimale Position

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

3.1

Neuester Test

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

176

86

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Trockenleistung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Vredestein Quatrac

95%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Vredestein Quatrac

51%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Vredestein Quatrac

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

Quatrac

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen