Vergleich: Kleber Quadraxer 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Kleber

Quadraxer 2

R13 – R20

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Quadraxer 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

CrossClimate 2

Anzahl der Tests

8

18

23

24

Optimale Position

#5

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.6

6.1

3.3

2.7

Neuester Test

2022

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

76

47

176

151

Nass

Kleber Quadraxer 2

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Nassbremsen

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Kleber Quadraxer 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Handling - nass

Kleber Quadraxer 2

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Kreisbahn nass

Kleber Quadraxer 2

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Schnee

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Schnee Handling

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Schneetraktion

Kleber Quadraxer 2

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Kleber Quadraxer 2

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Schnee Slalom

Kleber Quadraxer 2

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Kosten

Kleber Quadraxer 2

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Rollwiderstand

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Preis-Wert

Kleber Quadraxer 2

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Kilometerstand

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Trocken

Kleber Quadraxer 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Trockenbremsen

Kleber Quadraxer 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Handling - trocken

Kleber Quadraxer 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Komfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Außengeräusch

Kleber Quadraxer 2

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Komfort

Kleber Quadraxer 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Kleber Quadraxer 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Quadraxer 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Trocken

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen