57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
2
3
18
6
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
3.3
6.1
4.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
23
40
47
146

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich