56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
6
18
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
4.7
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
146
47

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich