57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
33
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
4.1
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
658

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich