57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
6
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
146

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich