57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
15
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
9.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
225

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich