57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
26
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
66

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich