57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
9
18
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.8
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
92
47

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich