Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

3

13

18

Optimale Position

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

5.6

3.3

6.2

6.1

Neuester Test

2023

2026

2024

Verfügbare Größen

47

40

530

47

Nass

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Aquaplaning - quer

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - längs

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Nassbremsen

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Handling - nass

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kreisbahn nass

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Seitenführung

Nokian WetProof

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Trocken

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Handling - trocken

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Außengeräusch

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Innengeräusche

Nokian WetProof

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Komfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Rollwiderstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kilometerstand

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Preis-Wert

Nokian WetProof

46%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen