56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
Optimale Position
#7
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
6.0
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
Verfügbare Größen
23
104
47

Nass

Nass
Nokian WR C3
31%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Schnee

Schnee
Nokian WR C3
96%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian WR C3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian WR C3
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich