57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
2
5
3
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
1.0
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
34
23
63
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich