56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
14
18
3
24
Optimale Position
#11
#8
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
13.4
6.1
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
153
47
34
151

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich