Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Anzahl der Tests

5

3

15

Optimale Position

#11

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

17.0

3.3

3.7

1.2

Neuester Test

2021

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

32

40

34

122

Nass

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Handling - nass

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Nassbremsen

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Schnee

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Kilometerstand

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rollwiderstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Außengeräusch

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Trocken

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Trockenbremsen

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Handling - trocken

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen