56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
1
5
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
1.0
2.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
64
63
34
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich