56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
18
3
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.3
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
40
47
40
126
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich