59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin ALPIN 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
ALPIN 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Anzahl der Tests
23
6
4
30
6
17
7
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.7
3.8
2.3
2.5
1.7
4.6
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
176
63
36
68
139
80
92

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
83%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bremsen auf Schnee
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Schneetraktion
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Schnee Handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Schnee Slalom
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Handling - nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
62%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
70%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Preis-Wert
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
43%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Eis
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Michelin ALPIN 7 Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 Hankook Ventus Evo Continental WinterContact TS 870 Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.