59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Michelin ALPIN 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
ALPIN 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Anzahl der Tests
23
6
4
30
6
17
10
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.7
3.8
2.3
2.5
1.7
2.1
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
176
63
36
68
139
80
195

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bremsen auf Schnee
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Schnee Handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Schneetraktion
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Schnee Slalom
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Preis-Wert
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Komfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Eis
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Michelin ALPIN 7 Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 Hankook Ventus Evo Continental WinterContact TS 870 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.