56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Vredestein ULTRAC gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
Optimale Position
#5
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2024
Verfügbare Größen
47

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich