57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Sava Eskimo HP2 gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Sava
Eskimo HP2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
15
23
14
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
15.5
6.7
3.6
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
28
107
194

Schnee

Schnee
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Schneetraktion
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Schnee Handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schnee Slalom
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Schneeleistung
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Trockenleistung
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Handling - trocken
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Nass

Nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Handling - nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kilometerstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preis-Wert
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rollwiderstand
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Eis

Eis
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Eis bremsen
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18Ansehen
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich