57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodride Solmax 1 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodride
Solmax 1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
2
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#8
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
9.5
6.1
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
64
46
47
40
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodride Solmax 1
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodride Solmax 1
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodride Solmax 1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodride Solmax 1
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodride Solmax 1
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodride Solmax 1
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich