Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

FourTech Plus

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

5

1

18

3

5

Optimale Position

#9

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

1.0

6.1

3.3

2.2

Neuester Test

2025

2024

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

24

64

47

60

63

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Preis-Wert

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

FourTech Plus

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen