57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
14
18
4
24
Optimale Position
#11
#8
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
13.4
6.1
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
153
47
40
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen