59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
1
1
4
24
17
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
1.0
3.8
2.7
1.3
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
40
27
66
36
151
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
93%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
76%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Viking Fourtech Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Hankook ION FlexClimate Hankook ION Evo Falken e.Ziex Michelin CrossClimate 2 Continental SportContact 7 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.