57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
24
5
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
3.3
2.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
40
151
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen