57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
18
24
3
Optimale Position
#11
#5
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
7.3
6.1
2.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
59
47
151
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen