59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
4
4
30
7
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.5
3.8
3.3
2.3
4.6
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
54
36
40
68
92

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
88%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
62%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
70%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
66%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
88%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Viking Fourtech Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Continental PremiumContact 7 Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.