Alle Tests: Kumho ECSTA Sport S PS72
| Organisation | Rang | Dimension | Jahr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top Tire Review | 2. | 255/35 R19 | 2026 |
| Sportscars | 5. | 255/35 R19 | 2026 |
| # | Name | Bewertung | Preis | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Continental SportContact 7 |
98.7
|
98.4
|
99.5
|
99.0
|
Highest category score: dry (99.5%).
|
Lowest category score: comfort (95.9%).
|
95.9
|
152 € 96 Y + 1 | ||
| 2. | Kumho ECSTA Sport S PS72 |
96.9
|
97.1
|
96.7
|
94.7
|
Highest category score: comfort (99.9%).
|
Lowest category score: value (94.7%).
|
99.9
|
121 € 96 Y | ||
| 3. | Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) |
95.8
|
94.2
|
96.8
|
100.0
|
Highest category score: value (100.0%).
|
Lowest category score: wet (94.2%).
|
96.2
|
167 € 96 Y + 1 | ||
| # | Name | - | Bewertung | Gesamtpunktesumme | Nass | Trocken | Laufende Kosten | Positive Merkmale | Neagative Merkmale | Abrollkomfort | Preis |
| # | Name | Bewertung | Preis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Continental SportContact 7 | vorbildlich |
1,2
|
1-
|
1-
|
152 € 96 Y + 1 | |
| 2. | Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo | vorbildlich |
1,4
|
2+
|
2+
|
146 € 96 Y | |
| 3. | Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) | gut |
1,6
|
2+
|
2
|
167 € 96 Y + 1 | |
| 3. | Vredestein Ultrac Pro | gut |
1,6
|
2
|
2+
|
120 € 96 Y | |
| 5. | Kumho ECSTA Sport S PS72 | gut |
1,9
|
2
|
2
|
121 € 96 Y | |
| 5. | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S | gut |
1,9
|
2-
|
2+
|
218 € 92 Y + 6 | |
| 7. | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 | gut |
2,0
|
2-
|
2
|
148 € 96 Y | |
| 8. | Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersport | befriedigend |
3,3
|
3
|
2-
|
185 € 96 Y + 2 | |
| # | Name | - | Bewertung | Gesamtpunktesumme | Nass | Trocken | Preis |
