Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. Falken e.Ziex Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 67%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Hankook ION Evo A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

3. Hankook ION Evo 60%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?