57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
10
4
6
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#3
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
6.0
12.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
109
111
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassfahrverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen