57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
4
4
6
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#3
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
6.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
109
111
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassfahrverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen