57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken EuroWinter HS02 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
EuroWinter HS02
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
18
10
Optimale Position
#1
#7
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.6
12.3
6.1
6.0
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
194
103
47
109

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Seitenführung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
Schneetraktion
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
Schnee Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
57%
Schnee Slalom
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Trockenleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Preis-Wert
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Eis
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen