57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: CST Medallion MD-A1 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

CST
Medallion MD-A1
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
5
4
Optimale Position
#10
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
21.5
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
264
139
40

Nass

Nass
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich