Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 54

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 7.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 4

1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Sehr gut

1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 62%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 0%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 69%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 71%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 76%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 52%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) 0%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) ?