59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
18
4
8
4
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#3
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.3
6.1
12.0
5.0
3.3
3.8
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
23
47
111
146
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk 2 Continental UltraContact NXT Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy Firestone Roadhawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.