Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

64%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

75.3%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

66%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?