56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
3
4
3
5
26
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.2
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
40
111
34
63
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich