56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
5
26
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
2.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
63
66
34
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich