59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
4
7
23
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.8
6.1
3.3
4.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
36
47
40
158
192

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
33%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
94%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
53%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
97%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
82%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Falken e.Ziex Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 Bridgestone Potenza Sport %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.