57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
5
18
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.7
2.2
6.1
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
34
63
47
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich