57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
4
15
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
12.0
9.0
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
111
226
36
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen