57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
4
15
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
9.0
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
40
226
36
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen