Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. Continental UltraContact NXT A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

74%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

75.3%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

50%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

91%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?