Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

Continental
PremiumContact 7

100%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?