Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 5 126

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Michelin Primacy 5 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 5 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Michelin Primacy 5 6.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Michelin Primacy 5 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Michelin Primacy 5 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Hankook ION Evo 2025

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Michelin Primacy 5 Testsieger

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin Primacy 5 Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Michelin
Primacy 5

58%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 51%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 65%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin Primacy 5 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Michelin
Primacy 5

63%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook ION Evo B

3. Michelin Primacy 5 B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

Michelin
Primacy 5

1%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

5. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Hankook ION Evo ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. Michelin Primacy 5 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Michelin
Primacy 5

72.5%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%