59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
8
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
5.0
3.3
3.8
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
47
146
40
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk 2 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Continental UltraContact NXT %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.