Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 51%