Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

75.3%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 51%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?