58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
8
4
5
24
4
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
3.3
2.2
2.7
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
146
40
63
150
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.