57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
3
13
4
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
1.3
4.3
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
23
123
40
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen